It is sad that this matter was taken so far.

Is this a case  of religious intolerance, expedience or something far worse

rosary beadsThese beads are often associated with catholics They are also worn by some for fashion

This is a story of freedom, not just one with religious overtones

Here is what happened, just keeping to facts

A  federal judge ordered a New York middle school to reinstate a seventh-grader ,  Raymond Hosier who was ordered suspended by a school for wearing rosary beads .

He wears  these prayer beads  in as a memory of his brother , who died clutching this rosary at a car acceident

Judge Lawrence Kahn ordered the boy to be reinstated pending a hearing on June 11 into whether the suspension violated his civil rights.

What is worrying is the reason given by the school.

The worrying thing is that district officials contend Hosier violated a policy banning them because they are worn as gang symbols

The American Center for Law and Justice to file a lawsuit on Tuesday in U.S. District Court arguing that Raymond’s suspension violated his rights to free religion.

The matter is even more fundamental

This is the essence of the problem

In this case the choice of a gang to wear a symbol or item of clothing was sufficient for a school and district officials to deny the right of law abiding people to be denied the right to do the same

That must be  a problem for all who treasure their freedoms

Let us hope the court upholds Hosier's rights at the full hearing.

It is a far bigger issue than rosary beads or religious tolerance. It is about freedom and the rights of the majority. It is about not allowing a minority to destroy the rights we all expect in a democracy. How can the school and district officials have not seen the thin end of this wedge?

Treating all internet traffic equally is the concept of net neutrality. The ability of the FCC to protect net neutrality has been struck down by a recent appeals court ruling. Now, the question is if net neutrality can be protected, or will your isp determine which payday loans online you can apply for?

FCC net neutrality actions ruled illegal

The federal appeals court just ruled on Comcast Corp. v. FCC, 08-1291. The FCC sanctioned Comcast Corp in 2008 when it slowed down internet service for users of Bittorret. Some users, a few trying to apply for payday loans no fax, complained to the FCC. The FCC sanction cited unequal access in Comcast's actions. Comcast sued, claiming that the FCC had overstepped legal authority. The federal appeals court ruled in favor of Comcast on April 6.

The basis of net neutrality

The United States government does not currently have a legal framework for net neutrality. The Federal Communications Commission does have the legal authority to regulate telecommunications services, which they refer to as "Title II" services. Title I services, otherwise known as Title I services, are not as heavily regulated. New legal framework to protect net neutrality is supported by the President, but no specific framework is being considered by Congress.

The argument against net neutrality

If broadband service is reclassified, many large providers have threatened the FCC with lawsuits. Providers such as AT&T and Verizon have spoken out loudly against net neutrality. Basically, providers have argued that the government should not involve themselves in network regulation. The providers claim that the federal government has no legal right to involve itself in network management.

How can the FCC protect net neutrality?

The federal government has invested a lot in the concept of net neutrality. The recently-written National Broadband plan puts a lot of stock in the concept of net neutrality. The FCC has three legal options. Classifying broadband service as Title II is the first option. Second, they can ask Congress to present a legal framework for net neutrality. 3rd, the FCC can appeal the recent decision to the Supreme Court.

Sources:

Computer World

Wall Street Journal

Nicollette Sheridan certainly enjoyed playing the role of Edie Britt on "Desperate Housewives." For the flirtatious, man-eating Ms. Britt, it was suitable to be voluntarily smacked around in the bedroom. Being smacked around by the producers of the program back stage and terminated without a good cause, however, was not.

Nicollette Sheridan is suing the producers of "Desperate Housewives" for assault and wrongful termination, according to the New York Times, and they may very much end up in need of payday loans to help with the lawsuit.

What brought the end to Nicollette Sheridan's character?

Nicollette Sheridan's lawsuit claims that back in September 2008, Marc Cherry, creator of the popular nighttime soap opera, struck her when Sheridan purportedly asked Cherry about a line in the script. According to the Associated Press, Marc Cherry's alleged response was to take Nicollette Sheridan aside and "forcefully hit her with his hand across her face and head."

To complain about Marc Cherry's alleged violent treatment, Nicollette Sheridan went directly to ABC, but it seemed her pleas fell heavily on deaf ears. Edie Britt was killed off not long after that. Sheridan has no doubt that it was a retaliation by ABC because she had the nerves to "make a fuss."

Edie Britt's death – what caused it?

It certainly has nothing to do with a lover or lover's wife or girlfriend seeking revenge. Zap2It profiles the fateful 2009 episode of "Desperate Housewives," and it was a patented deadly car crash. Orson, who was "running across the street after one of his breaking and entering," was saved from death as Edie swerved to avoid him. Her vehicle struck a utility pole, and fallen power lines hit the puddle of water where Edie's body had settled. It was the collision and electrocution that claimed the life out of her.

Remembering Nicollette Sheridan's character, flashback episodes of "Desperate Housewives" followed immediately after that episode. Edie "smacks" some senses into Lynette and Bree in two of the flashbacks, in hopes they can find the strength to face their own problems. Mrs. McCluskey "smacks" some sense into Edie's son Travis when he finds out about her death and is barely fazed. The final smack came when Mrs. McCluskey "smacks down" Edie for her attempt to sympathize with McCluskey over having lost a son.

Is all that smacking coincidence?

Considering Nicollette Sheridan's experience with Marc Cherry, it's an interesting word choice on the part of Zap2It. It could be coincidental, since the episode aired more than likely before the smack down was known to the public. However, Edie's death itself was made clear in Gabby's flashback from the same episode, when Nicollette Sheridan's character confided that she was going to die before her 50th birthday. How convenient of you, ABC. We'll see if Nicollette Sheridan smacks you down, and whether you'll need secured loans.